Crystal River High School Adequate Yearly Progress

Each report is comprised of 3 pages, each page is shown below . Select the year for the desired report.

Number of visitors to this page Hit Counter

2008/2009 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress Paper Report

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 82% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: YES   2008-2009 School Grade: D  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: YES      
  95% Tested Reading
 		 95% Tested Math
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  NO  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  NO  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  YES  NO  NO 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES NO  NO  NA  NA 

 

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 Read: 685
Math: 685   		2008-2009
School Grade1:		 D   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students? 		Math
Tested 95% of the students? 		65% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 68% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math		 % of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2008 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N 2009 Y/N
TOTAL4  98  Y  97  Y  38  N  74  Y  89   91  Y  66  76  Y  54  62  NA 28  26  NA 39  NA  76  NA 
WHITE  98  Y  98  Y  38  N  76  Y  88   91  Y  67  76  Y  53  62  NA 26  24  NA 39  NA  78  NA 
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  97  Y  97  Y  33  N  67  N  88   87  N  55  64  Y  65  67  NA 35  33  NA 34  NA  71  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA        
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  92  N  92  N    NA    NA  63   68  Y  38  41  Y      NA     NA        
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable. 		 
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the school's tested population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. Any subgroup is eligible for Safe Harbor as long as the school meets participation criteria for all subgroups and the subgroup meets the participation, writing, and graduation requirement. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient within three years should be 65% for reading and 68% for math. Any subgroup is eligible for the Growth Model as long as the school meets participation criteria for all subgroups and the subgroup meets the participation, writing, and graduation requirement.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2009. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2008-2009 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested: Read: 685
Math: 685  		 2008-2009 School Grade1: D   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Number of students enrolled
Reading		 Number Tested
Reading		 Number of students enrolled
Math		 Number Tested
Math		 Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2009 2009 2009 2009 2008 2009 2007 2008 2008 2009 2008 2009 2009 2009
TOTAL4  685  668  685  667  283  331  348  348  629  627  630  625  596  592 
WHITE  613  599  613  598  257  296  317  314  564  561  566  560  533  530 
BLACK  25  24  25  24  10  11  11  9  22  23  22  23  22  22 
HISPANIC  22  21  22  21  8  13  11  10  20  20  20  19  20  19 
ASIAN  9  9  9  9  1  5  3  5  3  9  3  9  7  7 
AMERICAN INDIAN  4  4  4  4  2  3  0  3  5  3  5  3  3  3 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  304  294  303  293  121  134  111  107  253  276  252  276  262  261 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  3  3  3  3  2  1  3  0  4  3  4  3  2  2 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  89  82  89  82  38  44  60  49  87  79  88  79  75  76 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. Any subgroup is eligible for Safe Harbor as long as the school meets participation criteria for all subgroups and the subgroup meets the participation, writing, and graduation requirement. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient with in three years, should be 65% for reading and 68% for math. Any subgroup is eligible for the Growth Model as long as the school meets participation criteria for all subgroups and the subgroup meets the participation, writing, and graduation requirement.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2009. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2007/2008 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress Paper Report

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 85% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: YES   2007-2008 School Grade: C  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: NO      
  95% Tested Reading
 		 95% Tested Math
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  NO  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  NO  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  YES  NO  YES 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES NO  NO  NA  NA 

 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 704
Math: 699   		2007-2008
School Grade1:		 C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students? 		Math
Tested 95% of the students? 		58% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 62% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math		 % of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2007 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N 2008 Y/N
TOTAL4  96  Y  96  Y  46  N  72  Y  84   89  Y  73  66  N  61  54  NA 34  28  NA 47  NA  81  NA 
WHITE  96  Y  96  Y  47  N  74  Y  84   88  Y  73  67  N  60  53  NA 32  26  NA 49  NA  82  NA 
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA   NA    NA 
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA   NA    NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA   NA    NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA   NA    NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  95  Y  95  Y  35  N  65  Y  80   88  Y  55  55  N  66  65  NA 38  35  NA 37  NA  77  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA   NA    NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  93  N  91  N    NA    NA  47   63  Y  40  38  N      NA 74    NA   NA    NA 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable. 		 
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the school's tested population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient within three years should be 58% for reading and 62% for math. That group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for the Growth Model if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, July 2008. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2007-2008 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 704
Math: 699  		 2007-2008 School Grade1: C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Number of students enrolled
Reading		 Number Tested
Reading		 Number of students enrolled
Math		 Number Tested
Math		 Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2008 2008 2008 2008 2007 2008 2006 2007 2007 2008 2007 2008 2008 2008
TOTAL4  704  660  699  658  312  283  355  348  647  629  638  630  592  595 
WHITE  629  592  625  590  285  257  332  317  592  564  585  566  531  534 
BLACK  27  23  26  23  10  10  7  11  21  22  20  22  21  21 
HISPANIC  22  22  22  22  7  8  5  11  15  20  14  20  19  19 
ASIAN  3  3  3  3  7  1  6  3  8  3  8  3  3  3 
AMERICAN INDIAN  5  5  5  5  0  2  0  0  2  5  2  5  5  5 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  283  265  280  262  115  121  103  111  260  253  254  252  238  238 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  4  4  4  4  1  2  1  3  3  4  3  4  4  4 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  103  92  103  90  47  38  55  60  107  87  104  88  82  83 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient with in three years, should be 51% for reading and 56% for math. That group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for the Growth Model if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2006/2007 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress Paper Report

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 82% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: NO   2006-2007 School Grade: C  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: YES      
  95% Tested Reading
 		 95% Tested Math
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  NO  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  NO  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  YES  NO  YES 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES  NO  NO  NO 

 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 697
Math: 696   		2006-2007
School Grade1:		 C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students? 		Math
Tested 95% of the students? 		51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 56% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math		 % of students on track to be proficient in reading Growth model reading % of students on track to be proficient in math Growth model math
  2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2006 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N 2007 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  Y  98  Y  39  N  66  Y  90   84  N  72  73  Y  58  61  NA 33  34  NA 51  NA  79  NA 
WHITE  99  Y  98  Y  40  N  68  Y  90   84  N  73  73  N  57  60  NA 31  32  NA 52  NA  81  NA 
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA  31  71  NA      NA 55    NA   NA    NA 
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA  78  60  NA      NA 64    NA   NA    NA 
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA    67  NA      NA 11    NA   NA    NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA 17    NA   NA    NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  97  Y  96  Y  34  N  62  Y  84   80  N  57  55  N  66  66  NA 44  38  NA 49  NA  77  NA 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA 67    NA   NA    NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  97  Y  94  N  10  N  26  N  62   47  N  42  40  N  86  90  NA 66  74  NA 27  NA  65  NA 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable. 		 
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient with in three years, should be 51% for reading and 56% for math. That group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for the Growth Model if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2007. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2006-2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 697
Math: 696  		 2006-2007 School Grade1: C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? NO   
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2). This section shows the percent of students "on track" to be proficient used to determine AYP via the growth model.
Group Number of students enrolled
Reading		 Number Tested
Reading		 Number of students enrolled
Math		 Number Tested
Math		 Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number of students with current and prior year Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2007 2007 2007 2007 2006 2007 2005 2006 2006 2007 2006 2007 2007 2007
TOTAL4  697  687  696  679  322  312  349  355  647  647  653  638  613  604 
WHITE  636  627  635  621  291  285  315  332  592  592  597  585  562  554 
BLACK  22  22  22  21  10  10  13  7  21  21  20  20  20  20 
HISPANIC  18  17  18  16  8  7  9  5  14  15  14  14  14  13 
ASIAN  8  8  8  8  4  7  5  6  8  8  9  8  7  7 
AMERICAN INDIAN  3  3  3  3  4  0  3  0  6  2  6  2  2  2 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  283  275  282  270  107  115  93  103  241  260  241  254  247  241 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  3  3  3  3  2  1  1  1  3  3  3  3  2  2 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  118  114  118  111  47  47  48  55  98  107  99  104  100  98 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
 
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total. Growth Model: If any group does not meet the proficiency and safe harbor requirements, the percentage of students in that group who are on track to be proficient with in three years, should be 51% for reading and 56% for math. That group must also make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for the Growth Model if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

2005/2006 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress Paper Report

Back to the top

2005-2006 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 85% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: YES   2005-2006 School Grade: C  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: NO      
  95% Tested Reading
 		 95% Tested Math
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  NO  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  NO  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  YES  NO  YES 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES  YES  NO  NO 

 

2005-2006 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 706
Math: 711   		2005-2006
School Grade1:		 C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? 5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Reading
Tested 95% of the students? 		Math
Tested 95% of the students? 		44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Percent of Students below grade level in Reading Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Percent of Students below grade level in Math Safe
Harbor
Math
  2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2006 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2004 2005 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N 2005 2006 Y/N
TOTAL4  98  Y  98  Y  42  N  67  Y  84   90  Y  80  72  N  63  58  NA 31  33  NA
WHITE  98  Y  98  Y  43  N  69  Y  85   90  NA  81  73  NA  63  57  NA 30  31  NA
BLACK    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  98  Y  98  Y  34  N  56  Y  78   84  NA  71  57  NA  66  66  NA 39  44  NA
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  95  Y  95  Y  14  N  34  N  61   62  NA  56  42  NA  85  86  NA 75  66  NA
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2007. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2005-2006 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 Read: 706
Math: 711  		 2005-2006 School Grade1: C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress?5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Number of students enrolled
Reading		 Number Tested
Reading		 Number of students enrolled
Math		 Number Tested
Math		 Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2006 2006 2006 2006 2005 2006 2004 2005 2005 2006 2005 2006
TOTAL4  706  691  711  698  296  322  313  349  653  647  657  653 
WHITE  643  631  648  637  274  291  291  315  597  592  600  597 
BLACK  25  24  24  23  9  10  14  13  24  21  24  20 
HISPANIC  16  15  15  15  8  8  3  9  18  14  19  14 
ASIAN  9  8  10  9  3  4  2  5  6  8  6  9 
AMERICAN INDIAN  6  6  6  6    4  1  3  3  6  3  6 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  268  260  269  260  93  107  72  93  230  241  234  241 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  3  3  3  3  1  2  2  1  1  3  1  3 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  112  106  112  106  49  47  36  48  100  98  102  99 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

2004/2005 School Year

Adequate Yearly Progress Paper Report

Back to the top

2004-2005 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 83% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: NO   2004-2005 School Grade: D  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: YES      
  95% Tested
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  NO  YES 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES  NO  NO 

 

2004-2005 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 (Click here to see the number of students in each group.) 		707   2004-2005
School Grade1:		 D   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? 5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Tested 95% of the students? 37% scoring at or above grade level in Reading? 44% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Showed 10% improvement in Reading percent not above grade level? Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Showed 10% improvement in Math percent not above grade level? Safe
Harbor
Math
  2005 Y/N 2005 Y/N 2005 Y/N 2004 2005 Y/N 2003 2004 Y/N 2004 2005 Y/N 2004 2005 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  Y  37  Y  69  Y  84   84  N  76  80  Y  63  63  NA 30  31  NA
WHITE  99  Y  37  Y  70  Y  84   85  NA  76  81  NA  63  63  NA 29  30  NA
BLACK    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  Y  34  N  61  Y  84   78  NA  58  71  NA  73  66  NA 43  39  NA
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  97  Y  15  N  25  N  61   61  NA  42  56  NA  83  85  NA 70  75  NA
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2007. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2004-2005 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 (Click the total number to return to the AYP results.)		 707   2004-2005 School Grade1: D   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress?5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Number of students enrolled Number Tested Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2005 2005 2004 2005 2003 2004 2004 2005 2004 2005
TOTAL4  707  697  301  296  353  313  646  653  649  657 
WHITE  649  639  282  274  327  291  598  597  601  600 
BLACK  24  24  5  9  11  14  18  24  18  24 
HISPANIC  20  20  8  8  10  3  18  18  18  19 
ASIAN  6  6  4  3  4  2  8  6  8  6 
AMERICAN INDIAN  3  3  0    1  1  0  3  0  3 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  255  252  85  93  81  72  222  230  222  234 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  1  1  0  1  4  2  1  1  1  1 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  115  110  36  49  77  36  102  100  102  102 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

2003/2004 School Year

Back to the top

2003-2004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - School Level - Page 1 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL - 0121
 
Did the School Make Adequate
Yearly Progress?		 NO   Percent of Criteria Met: 93% 
Total Writing Proficiency Met: YES   2003-2004 School Grade: C  
Total Graduation Criterion Met: YES      
  95% Tested
 		 Reading Proficiency Met Math Proficiency Met
TOTAL YES  YES  YES 
WHITE YES  YES  YES 
BLACK NA  NA  NA 
HISPANIC NA  NA  NA 
ASIAN NA  NA  NA 
AMERICAN INDIAN NA  NA  NA 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED YES  NO  YES 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS NA  NA  NA 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES YES  YES  NO 

 

2003-2004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 689   2003-2004
School Grade1:		 C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? 5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Tested 95% of the students? 31% Reading at or above grade level? 38% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Showed 10% improvement in Reading percent not above grade level? Safe
Harbor
Reading		 Showed 10% improvement in Math percent not above grade level? Safe
Harbor
Math
  2004 Y/N 2004 Y/N 2004 Y/N 2003 2004 Y/N 2002 2003 Y/N 2003 2004 Y/N 2003 2004 Y/N
TOTAL4  99  Y  37  Y  70  Y  83   84  Y  67  76  Y  64  63  NA 32  30  NA
WHITE  99  Y  37  Y  71  Y  84   84  N  67  76  Y  63  63  NA 31  29  NA
BLACK    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
HISPANIC    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ASIAN    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
AMERICAN INDIAN    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  99  Y  27  N  57  Y  74   84  Y  42  58  Y  77  73  N 45  43  NA
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  98  Y  17  N  30  N  49   61  Y  31  42  Y  93  83  Y 77  70  N
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2007. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2003-2004 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 689   2003-2004 School Grade1: C   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress?5 NO 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Number of students enrolled Number Tested Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2004 2004 2003 2004 2002 2003 2003 2004 2003 2004
TOTAL4  689  681  293  301  325  353  660  646  654  649 
WHITE  636  628  263  282  305  327  607  598  600  601 
BLACK  21  21  12  5  9  11  19  18  19  18 
HISPANIC  19  19  7  8  6  10  16  18  16  18 
ASIAN  8  8  4  4  4  4  10  8  10  8 
AMERICAN INDIAN      4  0  0  1  4  0  4  0 
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED  238  235  82  85  92  81  200  222  199  222 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  1  1  1  0  0  4  1  1  1  1 
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES  112  110  41  36  49  77  99  102  98  102 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

2002/2003 School Year

PDF of 2002/2003 report

Back to the top

2002-2003 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 2 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 697   2002-2003
School Grade1:		 B   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress? 5 N 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Tested 95% of the students? 31% Reading at or above grade level? 38% scoring at or above grade level in Math? Improved performance in Writing by 1%? Increased Graduation Rate3by 1%? Showed 10% improvement in Reading percent not above grade level? Showed 10% improvement in Math percent not above grade level?
  2003 Y/N 2003 Y/N 2003 Y/N 2002 2003 Y/N 2001 2002 Y/N 2002 2003 Y/N 2002 2003 Y/N
Total  100  Y  36  Y  68  Y  85   83  N  71  67  N  63  64  NA 35  32  NA
White  99  Y  37  Y  69  Y  85   84  N  72  67  N  61  63  NA 33  31  NA
Black    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA 77    NA
Hispanic    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
Asian    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
American Indian    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
Economically Disadvantaged  98  Y  23  N  55  Y  79   74  N  67  42  N  73  77  NA 49  45  NA
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS    NA    NA    NA      NA      NA      NA     NA
Students With Disabilities  96  Y  7  N  23  N  47   49  Y  26  31  Y  90  93  NA 73  77  NA
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2007. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

 

2002-2003 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report - Page 3 Citrus CRYSTAL RIVER HIGH SCHOOL 0121
Number of students enrolled in the grades tested:
 		 697   2002-2003 School Grade1: B   Did the School make Adequate Yearly Progress?5 N 
This section shows the percent tested and performance for each group used to determine AYP (Parts a and c2). This section shows the improvement for each group used to determine AYP via safe harbor (Part b2).
Group Number of students enrolled Number Tested Number with Writing test scores Number included in Graduation Rate3 Number with Reading scores on FCAT or other assessment Number with Math scores on FCAT or other assessment
  2003 2003 2002 2003 2001 2002 2002 2003 2002 2003
Total  697  697  241  293  303  325  651  660  641  654 
White  640  632  224  263  273  305  594  607  585  600 
Black  21  21  10  12  14  9  31  19  31  19 
Hispanic  17  17  5  7  8  6  14  16  13  16 
Asian  10  10  2  4  6  4  6  10  6  10 
American Indian  4  4    4  0  0  4  4  4  4 
Economically Disadvantaged  215  211  53  82  72  92  191  200  190  199 
ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS  1  1  2  1  1  0  3  1  3  1 
Students With Disabilities  107  103  34  41  39  49  97  99  94  98 
KEY: Economically Disadvantaged - Eligible for free or reduced price lunch
ELL - English Language Learners
SWD - Students with Disabilities		 Y/N - Was the required target met? Yes or No
NA - is shown when the number of students in the group is less than 304 or the data are not applicable.
1 Under Florida's AYP plan, schools with a grade of D or F cannot be designated as making AYP.
2 The "part" designations used in this table correspond to the three main paragraphs in the Federal regulations for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002. The regulations, effective January 2, 2004, were published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 231, on December 2, 2003. Sections 200.13-200.21 describe the indicators to be collected and how to determine AYP.
3 The school-wide data for writing and graduation rate are used in Part a. Any group not meeting the reading or mathematics targets under Part a is reviewed in Part b-Safe Harbor. When the writing percent proficient is >90 or the graduation rate is >85, increases are not required.
4 If the total number of students in a school is greater than ten, adequate yearly progress for the school will be determined; however, a minimum of 30 students and represents more than 15% of the schools’ population or 100 students is required for each group within a school.
5 If "P", this indicates provisional AYP. A provisional AYP is assigned if a school did not meet AYP, but received a school grade of A or B.
Note: All percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. The Y and N designations indicate if there was a 1% increase.
Note: In order to maintain the anonymity and privacy of students, proficiency data is not displayed for values <=5% and >=95%
Percent Tested and Proficiency Levels (Part a and c2): A school or school district makes AYP if 95% of each group is tested, if each group meets the proficiency targets in reading and mathematics, and if the school-wide writing percent proficient and graduation rate increases. Safe Harbor (Part b2): If any group in Part a does not meet the proficiency target, the percentage of students in that group who are below the proficiency target in reading or mathematics should be reduced by at least 10%. That group also must make progress in writing proficiency and graduation rate. No group is eligible for Safe Harbor if the school fails to meet participation criteria for all subgroups and the writing, graduation rate, and school grade criteria for the school in total.
Data provided by the Florida Department of Education, June 2005. Subject to review and verification by local school district staff.

Back to the top